The last week on Capitol Hill felt like watching a high‑stakes chess match. 

All the pieces are now in motion. The Senate Banking Committee released a 182-page update to the Responsible Financial Innovation Act on September 5, while twelve Senate Democrats led by Sen. Ruben Gallego unveiled their own digital asset privacy framework on September 9.  

Meanwhile, the SEC and CFTC issued joint statements signaling unprecedented regulatory cooperation. Here's what these developments may mean for entrepreneurs building blockchain protocols and the investors who fund them.

Launch an ICO on StartEngine

The CLARITY Act could provide a clear legal framework for token-based fundraising. If you’re building a blockchain project and want to be among the first to launch a regulated ICO in the U.S., StartEngine wants to hear from you.

Apply to Raise »

Senate and Congress: dueling drafts and a bipartisan push

A 182‑page Senate draft arrives

On September 5 the Senate Banking Committee released an updated 182‑page discussion draft of the Responsible Financial Innovation Act (RFIA). It builds on the 32‑page draft circulated in July but remains distinct from the House’s Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act of 2025. 

The updated draft keeps the Senate’s “ancillary asset” concept and continues to distinguish between securities and non‑securities based on whether a token is tied to an investment contract. 

Notably, the draft adds greater protections for developers of non‑custodial software, reflecting advocacy by more than 100 industry participants[1]. Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott intends to move the RFIA through committee this month[2], while the Senate Agriculture Committee is expected to release its own draft addressing Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issues later this month[3].

The big question was whether Senate Republicans would revert to the House bill’s decentralization test for determining whether a token is a security. They did not. Instead, they kept the ancillary‑asset framework, but with tweaks that expand safe harbors and give developers more breathing room[1]. 

The draft also requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to adopt rules defining “investment contract” and establishes a new Regulation Crypto, providing exemptions for token offerings up to $75 million or 10 % of total supply[4]. 

This is a clear signal that Congress wants to give startups a viable path to raise capital without being crushed under full securities‑registration requirements.

Democrats propose a privacy‑oriented framework

On September 9 a coalition of twelve Senate Democrats led by Sen. Ruben Gallego released a six‑page framework for digital‑asset legislation. 

The document states that digital‑asset policy should be guided by protecting financial privacy while denying bad actors access to the financial system[5]. It proposes requiring digital‑asset platforms to register with FinCEN, adopting anti‑money‑laundering (AML) and counter‑terrorism policies, and ensuring that crypto platforms comply with U.S. sanctions—even if domiciled abroad[6]. 

The framework also calls for addressing bad actors’ use of DeFi platforms and isolating non‑compliant ecosystems[7]. Notably, the document is far less detailed than the RFIA draft and leaves open many questions around implementation, particularly regarding decentralized finance (DeFi). 

Nevertheless, the Democrats’ entry into the conversation signals bipartisan recognition that the market‑structure bill must move and that privacy is now part of the negotiation.

What this means

The Senate is now juggling three documents: the House‑passed CLARITY Act, the Senate Banking Committee’s RFIA and the Democrats’ privacy framework. 

These competing drafts mean the final bill is still in flux, but the direction is clear. Congressional leaders want to pass market‑structure legislation this year, and there is bipartisan momentum: even Democrats are proposing their own ideas rather than blocking the process. 

For founders, the takeaway is to expect compromise, not gridlock. The final law will likely include the House’s definition of “digital commodities,” the Senate’s “ancillary assets” and new privacy provisions. That’s good; it means more clarity and fewer surprises.

Entrepreneurs: a new path to raise capital

Exemption for small token sales

One of the biggest innovations in the CLARITY Act is a new offering exemption from registration under the Securities Act. 

The Arnold & Porter analysis explains that U.S.‑organized issuers could sell tokens without full SEC registration if total sales over 12 months don’t exceed $75 million and no purchaser acquires more than 10 % of the total supply[8]. 

Issuers must still provide comprehensive disclosures—covering network maturity, source code, transaction history, consensus mechanism, development plan and affiliate ownership—and must file semi‑annual updates until the blockchain is certified as “mature”[9]. 

This exemption balances innovation with investor protection: entrepreneurs gain breathing room to build, while investors get the transparency they need. Crucially, once the network matures, oversight shifts from the SEC to the CFTC[10].

The Senate draft includes a similar safe harbor. Section 101 of the RFIA treats “ancillary assets” as non‑securities when traded on secondary markets and requires the SEC to issue guidance on disclosures for ancillary‑asset originators[11]. It also permits issuers to rely on Regulation Crypto—subject to caps and disclosure requirements similar to the House bill[4]. 

In short, both chambers agree that startups need a way to legally sell tokens to early adopters, and that disclosures—not enforcement actions—should be the primary tool for investor protection.

Developers get protections

Industry advocacy made an impact. The updated Senate draft includes stronger protections for non‑custodial software and DeFi infrastructure, a change spearheaded by the DeFi Education Fund and more than a hundred industry participants[12]. 

These provisions help ensure that developers of open‑source wallets, smart contracts and DeFi protocols aren’t accidentally treated as broker‑dealers or exchanges. That’s a big win for entrepreneurs building the rails of the crypto economy.

How to prepare today

Even though the law hasn’t passed, there are steps founders can take now:

1. Get your disclosures in order. The CLARITY Act’s exemption requires detailed disclosures about your blockchain’s mechanics and your team’s token holdings[9]. If you’re planning a token sale, start drafting those documents now.
2. Plan for dual oversight. Your token may start under SEC supervision but shift to the CFTC once the network matures. Build compliance systems that can handle both regimes.
3. Use existing exemptions. Until the CLARITY Act becomes law, raising capital through Reg CF or Reg A+ remains the most viable option for U.S. startups. These paths are open today on platforms like StartEngine; consider running an equity round while you develop your token economics.
4. Stay nimble. The Senate draft is 182 pages and still evolving. Be ready to adjust your structure as lawmakers reconcile differences between “digital commodities” and “ancillary assets.”

SEC, CFTC, and the new cooperative era

Joint statements open the door to spot trading

In a dramatic shift, the SEC and CFTC issued joint statements in early September that signaled a new era of cooperation. On Sept 2 staff from both agencies clarified that SEC‑ and CFTC‑registered exchanges are not prohibited from facilitating the trading of certain spot commodity products[13]. 

SEC Chair Paul Atkins said the joint statement represents a “significant step forward in bringing innovation in the crypto asset markets back to America,” stressing that market participants should have the freedom to choose where they trade spot crypto assets[14]. 

CFTC Acting Chair Caroline Pham noted that under the prior administration the message was that “innovation was not welcome” and declared that chapter over[15].

A few days later, on Sept 5, the two agencies issued another joint statement on regulatory harmonization and announced a joint roundtable to be held on Sept 29. The statement proclaimed a “new day at the SEC and the CFTC” and said the agencies would work in lockstep to provide markets the clarity they deserve[16]. 

The chairs called for harmonizing product and venue definitions, aligning capital and margin frameworks and creating coordinated innovation exemptions[17]. They emphasised that aligning their frameworks would reduce unnecessary barriers and create space for innovation to thrive[18]. 

For entrepreneurs, this cooperative stance means one less regulatory obstacle—multiple regulators are beginning to speak with one voice.

Crypto Task Force turns to privacy and surveillance

Not content to wait for Congress, the SEC’s Crypto Task Force announced on Sept 8 that it will host a public roundtable on financial surveillance and privacy on October 17[19]. 

Commissioner Hester Peirce explained that understanding privacy‑preserving technologies is critical and that the roundtable would help regulators craft policy solutions that protect individuals while enabling innovation[20]. The task force is also soliciting written input and conducting meetings with industry experts[21].

Regulatory agenda and rulemaking

In addition to public statements, the SEC has signaled it will press forward with rulemaking regardless of Congress. The SEC’s Spring 2025 regulatory agenda includes five crypto‑specific items: proposals on crypto asset offerings, custody rules, transfer agents, broker‑dealer financial responsibility, and crypto market‑structure amendments[22]. 

According to the SEC, these proposals are meant to “provide greater certainty to the market” and withdraw outdated items that don’t align with a smart, effective regulatory approach[23]. The message is clear: the agency intends to modernize its rules to accommodate on‑chain finance.

Looking forward

Washington’s “crypto sprint” isn’t just a catchphrase; it’s happening. The Senate is racing to reconcile competing drafts, Democrats are finally putting privacy concerns on paper, and regulators are stepping out together. This momentum suggests that comprehensive digital‑asset legislation could be on the President’s desk by year‑end. Entrepreneurs should see this as a call to action—use the current clarity we have to build, prepare for compliance, and engage with regulators.

What I’ll be watching next week:

• Whether the Senate Agriculture Committee releases its companion draft and how it addresses CFTC jurisdiction.
• Which stakeholders are invited to the Sept 29 harmonization roundtable—and whether DeFi developers get a seat at the table.
• How the privacy debate evolves after Democrats’ framework and ahead of the Oct 17 SEC roundtable.

The regulatory landscape is changing fast, but one thing is certain: opportunity flows where clarity grows. Stay informed, stay compliant and stay ready.

Launch an ICO on StartEngine

The CLARITY Act could provide a clear legal framework for token-based fundraising. If you’re building a blockchain project and want to be among the first to launch a regulated ICO in the U.S., StartEngine wants to hear from you.

Apply to Raise »

Important Disclosures

This article may contain forward‑looking statements and projections. These are not guarantees; actual outcomes may differ materially.

Investing in private, pre‑IPO companies is highly speculative and illiquid. Such investments are intended only for accredited investors who can bear the risk of total loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult a financial advisor before investing.

Securities offered through StartEngine Primary, LLC, member FINRA/SIPC. This is a general investment recommendation for accredited investors under Regulation Best Interest; it is not personalized investment advice. Review our Form CRS and Reg BI disclosure to understand our services and conflicts.

Sources

[1] [2] [12] [22] [23] Crypto Sprint: Congress and Agencies Move Fast

https://natlawreview.com/article/blockchain-bi-weekly-senate-market-structure-released-and-administrative-agencies

[3] [4] [11] Senate Banking Committee Releases Discussion Draft of the Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2025 | Davis Wright Tremaine

https://www.dwt.com/blogs/financial-services-law-advisor/2025/09/senate-responsible-financial-innovation-act-draft

[5] [6] [7] Why The Democrats’ Latest Framework For Crypto Market Structure Could Hurt Financial Privacy

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/politics/why-the-democrats-latest-framework-for-crypto-market-structure-could-hurt-financial-privacy

[8] [9] [10] Clarifying the CLARITY Act: What To Know About the House Crypto Market Structure Bill and Its Path to Law | Advisories | Arnold & Porter

https://www.arnoldporter.com/en/perspectives/advisories/2025/08/clarifying-the-clarity-act

[13] [14] [15] SEC.gov | SEC and CFTC Staff Issue Joint Statement on Trading of Certain Spot Crypto Asset Products

https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-110-sec-cftc-staff-issue-joint-statement-trading-certain-spot-crypto-asset-products

[16] [17] [18] SEC.gov | SEC and CFTC Issue Joint Statement on Regulatory Harmonization Efforts; Will Co-Host Roundtable Sept. 29

https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-112-sec-cftc-issue-joint-statement-regulatory-harmonization-efforts-will-co-host-roundtable-sept-29

[19] [20] [21] SEC.gov | SEC Crypto Task Force to Host Roundtable on Financial Surveillance and Privacy

https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-114-sec-crypto-task-force-host-roundtable-financial-surveillance-privacy